New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to order an SIT investigation into the arrest of five rights activists by the Maharashtra police, and ordered four more weeks of house arrest. During these four weeks, the activists – Sudha Bharadwaj, Vernon Gonsalves, Arun Ferreira, Varavara Rao and Gautam Navlakha – may approach the concerned court for relief, the court said.
A three-judge bench of Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra and Justices A.M. Khanwilkar and D.Y. Chandrachud were hearing the matter. Justice Chandrachud presented a dissenting opinion.
The court was hearing a petition filed by Romila Thapar, Prabhat Patnaik, Devaki Jain, Satish Deshpande and Maja Daruwala.
In the majority verdict read out by the CJI, the judges said, “This is not a case of arrest merely because of dissent or difference in political views.”
“Accused persons do not have say in which investigating agency should probe the case,” Misra said.
Expressing his dissenting opinion, Justice Chandrachud said that “Technicalities should not be allowed to override substantive justice”. He also said that the petition filed by Thapar and others in the Supreme Court was “not motivated by political aspects”, Bar and Bench reported.
Chandrachud also said that the way the Maharashtra police had acted raised serious questions about whether they were fit to carry out the investigation. He said that an SIT should be constituted to probe the case. “Voices of opposition cannot be muzzled because it is a dissent. Deprivation of liberty cannot be compensated later,” Bar and Bench quoted him as saying.
The judge questioned the Maharashtra police’s decision to take their “evidence” to the press, saying they were trying to “manipulate public opinion”. “Letter alleged to be written by Sudha Bharadwaj was flashed on a TV channel. The police is selectively disclosing probe details to the media, casting a cloud on the fairness of our investigation,” Chandrachud said.
Responding to the Supreme Court’s order, advocate Susan Abraham, wife of Vernon Gonsalves said, “The verdict has been welcomed and we are glad that the court has not handed over the custody of these five to the police but continued their house arrest under the SC’s supervision. It has now given us the choice to explore other legal options. We will shortly decide on our next legal course of action.”
The petition had sought for setting up of an SIT which was declined by the court today. Abraham said that part of the decision was “disheartening”. “We had hoped that the SIT would be constituted and the case would be taken off the Pune police’s hand. However, that did not happen,” she added.
The petitioners had asked for an SIT probe and argued that false charges were being slapped on the activists to silence their dissenting voices. “Issue appropriate direction, directing an independent investigation into arrest of these human rights activists in June and August 2018 in connection with the Bhima-Koregaon violence,” the petition said. “The use of draconian Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act against these activists who have no history of indulging or instigating any violence is clearly malafide and an attempt to brow beat and intimidate the dissenting voices.”
Maharashtra police on August 28 raided the homes of prominent activists in several states and arrested five of them for suspected ‘Maoist links’, sparking a chorus of outraged protests from human rights defenders.
Prominent Telugu poet Varavara Rao was arrested from Hyderabad, activists Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira from Mumbai, trade union activist Sudha Bharadwaj from Faridabad and civil liberties activist Gautam Navlakha was arrested from New Delhi.