Days Before National Handloom Day, Centre Scrapped Handloom and Handicrafts Boards 

The Centre has explained the decision by arguing that it is part of its efforts to strive for a leaner government apparatus.

New Delhi: On Friday, textiles minister Smriti Irani shared several pictures of herself and some celebrities dressed in handloom products on her social media pages to mark National Handloom Day. Just a few days prior, though, on July 27, her ministry issued a notification scrapping the All India Handloom Board and then, on August 3, it abolished the All India Handicrafts Board.

The ministry has explained the decision by arguing that it is part of its efforts to strive for a leaner government apparatus. “In consonance with the Government of India vision of ‘Minimum Government and Maximum Governance’, a leaner government machinery and the need for systematic rationalisation of government bodies, the Government of India has abolished All India Handloom Board with effect from the date of this resolution,” the ministry said.

The move, though, has drawn severe criticism from those working for the promotion of Indian handicrafts. “All these years on, it remained the one official forum, however watered down, where the voices and views of weavers and craftspeople could be expressed directly. One place where  representatives of the sector were present in considerable numbers, and were actually empowered to advise  the Government in policy and sectoral spending,” said Laila Tyabji, chairperson of Dastakar, an NGO that works to support traditional Indian craftspeople.

Also read: ‘There Has Been No Business This Year’: Demand Plummets For Bengal’s Weavers

The two boards were decades old, with the All India Handlooms Board having been set up in 1992 and the All India Handicrafts Board in 1952, and played the role of advising the government on formulating policies related to their sectors. The boards included officials from the Central and state governments, representatives of the industry and craftspeople themselves. Tyabji now fears that the voices of the creators will not have a platform.

“The spaces where people themselves can interact directly with Government, or be part of their own governance, are certainly becoming leaner and increasingly few in number. It is worrying,” she said.

The government’s explanation for scrapping the boards with a view of its objective of ‘minimum goverment’ has also been criticised. “Expenditure on this (handloom) Board is hardly Rs 1,00,000 per year. One would wonder what made the managers of ‘Minimum Government and Maximum Governance’ programme to pick up to reduce their expenditure, where no expenditure has been happening,” wrote public policy expert Narasimha Reddy in the Siasat Daily.

Reddy also pointed out that the move comes at a time when weavers are facing a difficult time due to the economics impacts of the COVID-19 induced lockdown. “Handloom weavers are facing a severe livelihood crisis. Primarily, despite highly rated skills and widely appreciated products, income flows have been an issue for families dependent on handloom weaving.”

He also pointed out that budget allocations for handloom have been seeing cuts in the last few years and that the Atmanirbhar Bharat package also did not include any substantial intervention that could be of benefit to handloom weavers.

Also read: A Life Measured in Metres and Yards

Jaya Jaitly, founder and president of Dastakari Haat Samiti, had a different point of view and argued that it was for the better that the boards have been scrapped. “I am glad it has been abolished. It was made gradually useless since the beginning of the 1990s and declined continuously since. I have been personally associated with this exercise in futility since then,” she told FirstPost.

Jaitly said that it would be more appropriate to create a new mechanism to promote handlooms. “It is best to be rid of it and create something new, effective, dynamic in tune with an Aatmanirbhar Bharat on a clean slate, with inputs from truly experienced and knowledgeable persons rather than use it for the patronage of favourites. It became a mere ritual just like many other meaningless rituals.”