Paid news in the service of the nation.
A shift away from cash reliance will come only when the urban middle class finds plastic money more convenient, not with forceful government intervention.
Proponents of demonetisation say it was required for market correction. However, given the magnitude of government interference involved, it is likely to disrupt markets rather than correct them.
How much money will come through the second income disclosure scheme and by tracking down hitherto unidentified black money? What will it be used for?
To tackle black money that originates in the process of electing MPs and MLAs, the legal provision that freezes the number of Lok Sabha and state assembly states must be revisited.
The Sena also said that the BJP is living in a fool’s paradise if they think that demonetisation has ended the menace of black money
How Narendra Modi has brought back dark memories of colonial India.
While Modi’s statements about the economy fall flat when compared to data, most of the promises the prime minister made are simply new packaging on old schemes.
In a speech full of faulty economic reasoning, Modi made one factual claim – the number of Indians with official incomes greater than Rs 10 lakh is just 24 lakh. If demonetisation really works, he needs to up that figure substantially in the next two years.
Smaller informal economy players have totally lost out in this bizarre game, when they sold their currency at a discount only to help hawala dealers and middlemen make huge profits.
The government rejected the idea of demonetisation because it believes that such a move “would adversely affect the efficiency of exchange in business”.
While the prime minister is partly right, it isn’t the whole picture and there is certainly more than enough blame to go around.
If the Modi government is serious about acting against black money and corruption, why is it shying away from regulating political funding?
Blaming the money laundering instances on a few employees and suspending officials may deflect public and regulatory criticism but the cancer is widespread.
It is in both the Congress and the BJP’s interests that these records are not looked into; the Supreme Court should step in and insist on a proper investigation.
How does Narendra Modi’s demonetisation “surgical strike” help deal with the problem of black money in politics? The answer is simple: It doesn’t.
Deposits in excess of Rs 5,000 will only be credited once, and that too after the depositor is questioned as to why the notes weren’t deposited earlier.
The greater and longer the pain of demonetisation, the greater is the degree to which one of its key premises is undermined.
Although the BJP says demonetisation will target unaccounted money, it and other national parties have in the past failed to submit their income tax returns and disclose sources of donations.
The new black money disclosure scheme will start from December 17 and continue up to March 31, 2017.
The prime minister also pointed out that demonetisation should have been carried out in 1971 by Indira Gandhi, as was recommended by the Wanchoo committee.
Despite the hardships being faced by the working class due to the note ban, the rhetoric of fighting corruption and targeting the wealthy means they are bearing the pain in silence.
The scheme will give tax dodgers another chance to come clean by paying 50% of tax on the junked currency deposited in banks post demonetisation.
Invoking people’s power as a force higher than state power, as the prime minister appears to be doing, is highly dangerous.
A look back at how demonetisation has affected everyday lives and the country’s economy since it was enforced.
When a government which says it wants to remove black money tries to defend acceptance of foreign money by political parties and opposes transparency of political funding, doubts arise about its actual intentions.
‘We don’t agree that any money coming from abroad [for politics] will completely change our thinking. Does it mean that if FDI is coming, government will be influenced by some other country?’
Demonetisation may be unprecedented as an economic policy, but there is nothing novel about this kind of politics, as the Sangh parivar knows all too well.
The original assumptions underlying the decision remain unclear, but it seems to be causing considerable harm. Although popular right now, demonetisation may not end up being a good bargain.
The Ahmedabad property dealer who was a proxy for politicians and businessmen who sought to benefit from the Modi government’s undeclared income amnesty scheme has said he will name names.
M.K. Venu, founding editor of The Wire, in conversation with our correspondent Anuj Srivas on the implementation of demonetisation so far.
Demonetisation has forced a cultural process of organised assembly into existence – outside banks, post offices and ATMs.
Did the government count its chickens before they hatched? Demonetisation as a means of extinguishing black money may be a pipe dream now.
If deposit trends so far and projections are to be believed, the black money expected to be purged may be much less than what the government hoped.
Making India a less-cash economy will not necessarily end the generation of black money. It only means that the circulation of black income will take place differently.
Without follow-up measures, it will be difficult for Modi to counter the charge that demonetisation is meant to serve a narrower political and personal agenda.
The former banker and AAP leader talks on the disservice done to India’s banking system and why we weren’t better prepared to become a cashless economy.
The Modi government has reneged on a significant compromise on national language made during the constituent assembly debates – the Munshi-Ayyangar formula.
In an October speech, Reddy noted that there is “a subsisting interest in influential policy circles to keep a window for round-tripping” open.
Prominent lawyer Prashant Bhushan discusses the recent Sahara-Birla diaries, over-invoicing of coal imports by Reliance and Adani groups, and the Essar tapes.