New Delhi: Reacting to the verdict of the Supreme Court on Saturday in the Ayodhya title dispute case, leaders of the Muslim communities have said that they “respect the judgement but are not fully satisfied by it.”At a joint press conference organised by several Muslim organisations such as the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), Jamaat e Islami Hind and Jamiat Ulema Hind, the community leaders stated, after studying the judgement in detail, that they will in all probability file a review petition.Addressing the media in the national capital shortly after the apex court unanimously decided in favour of building a Hindu temple on the disputed land, Zafaryab Jilani, the lawyer for Sunni Waqf Board, said, “We will go through the judgment in detail and with the assistance of our seniors like Rajeev Dhawan and most likely we will file review petition.”Also read: Supreme Court Upholds VHP Claim, Clears Decks for Ram Temple at Babri Masjid SiteAppealing for peace and law and order, Jilani added that there was no need to get over emotional. Endorsing Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s statement on the verdict, Jilani said the verdict should not be viewed as victory of the one party and defeat of another.The leaders expressed their contentment at the fact that the apex court had observed that the demolition of the Babri Masjid in 1992 was “an egregious violation of the rule of law” and that the act of placing idols inside the mosque was wrong.“This gives us hope that in future no other mosque in the country will be touched,” said M.R. Shamshad, another lawyer who represented the Muslim side.Speaking at the press conference, Syed Sadatullah Hussaini, president of Jamaat e Islami Hind said that they totally endorse the statements made by the lawyers and “whatever will be decided after consultation we will stand by it”.However, the AIMPLB has expressed its disappointment over the verdict. “The judgment is against our expectations. We presented solid evidences to prove our stance. Our legal committee will review the judgment,” tweeted the AIMPLB handle, on behalf of its general secretary.“The judgment is against our expectations. We presented solid evidences to prove our stance. Our legal committee will review the judgment.We have sincerely tried to fulfill our responsibility to restore the demolished #BabriMasjid“: GS of @AIMPLB_Official#AYODHYAVERDICT— All India Muslim Personal Law Board (@AIMPLB_Official) November 9, 2019Another leader of the AIMPLB, Kamal Farooqui, also expressed his disappointment over the verdict. According to a report by ANI, Farooqui said, “I am a bit upset because the Supreme Court promised that the verdict will be on the basis of facts and not faith. But it seems that the verdict was more based on faith rather than facts.”“Even if you will give us 100 acres of land then also that will be of no use. Our 67 acres of land have already been acquired, so what are they giving us in a donation? They have taken our 67 acres of land and in return giving us five acres. What kind of justice is this?,” he asked.According to a report by PTI expressing satisfaction on the judgment, Iqbal Ansari, one of the litigants, said he would not challenge the decision in court. “We welcome the Supreme Court decision and the biggest happiness is that it is finally curtains down on this long pending issue,” Ansari told PTI over the phone from Ayodhya.Also read: What the Supreme Court’s Ayodhya Judgment Means for the Future of the Republic“We will not challenge the court verdict from our side,” he said, adding, “we are very happy with the decision.” According to the news agency, Ansari said it was always said that whatever the court would say would be correct.At the press conference, referring to Ansari’s statement when a reporter asked Jilani is the litigants were satisfied with the judgment, Jilani said, “If you remember even after the 2010 high court verdict Hashim Ansari (Iqbal’s father) had expressed his contentment and opined that we would not appeal against the verdict. However, it was eventually decided that review petition should be filed.”Commenting on the judgement, Shia Cleric Maulana Kalbe Jawad, said, “We humbly accept SC verdict, I am thankful to god that Muslims by and large have accepted this verdict and the dispute has ended now.” However, he also added that it is the right of Muslim side to file review petition.Shia Cleric Maulana Kalbe Jawad: We humbly accept SC verdict, I am thankful to god that Muslims by and large have accepted this verdict and the dispute has ended now. Though its their(Muslim Personal law board) right to file review petition I think matter should just end now pic.twitter.com/pIvBSQGrxh— ANI (@ANI) November 9, 2019Meanwhile, it is learnt that after a meeting of various Muslim organisations, it has been decided that they will not accept the five acres of land offered to them in judgement.