New Delhi: A single judge bench of the Delhi high court on Monday declared that there was no “cut and paste” in its order that rejected the bail plea of senior Congress leader P. Chidambaram in the INX Media case last week.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait, who pronounced the order last Friday, took up the matter suo motu today and asked the Hindu and the Indian Express to accordingly publish clarifications in their Tuesday editions.Over the weekend, a spotlight fell on Justice Kait’s judgement after it was observed that Paragraph 35 and a few others dealt with the facts of a case that had no relation to the INX Media case or the Enforcement Directorate’s probe against the former finance minister.Paragraph 35 of the bail order curiously states:“It is alleged that during the period from 15.11.2016 to 19.11.2016 huge cash to the tune of Rs. 31.75 crores was deposited in eight bank accounts in Kotak Mahindra Bank in the accounts of ‘group of companies’. It gives details of demand draft issued from 15.11.2016 to 19.11.2016 from eight bank accounts in the name of Sunil Kumar, Dinesh Kumar, Abhilasha Dubey, Madan Kumar, Madan Saini, Satya Narain Dagdi and Seema Bai on various dates. Most of the Demand Drafts issued have since been recovered.”The facts of this case, however, refer to a separate 2017 bail application in the Delhi high court (Enforcement Directorate vs Rohit Tandon). Paragraph 35 also does not come with any referencing on why the facts of the Rohit Tandon case were included in this judgement, although the case itself is mentioned earlier to talk about aspects of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.Also read: ED Moves Delhi HC, Seeks to Rectify Errors in Chidambaram’s Bail OrderJustice Suresh Kumar Kait has now said that he wishes to make it clear that the “observations made in para 35 shall be read as and are confined to the case of ‘Rohit Tandon vs Enforcement Directorate’.“It has nowhere been mentioned that the observations made in para 35 of the judgment are of the present case (i.e., P. Chidambaram case). Thus, there is no copy-paste as alleged and I hereby make it clear that the observations made in para 35 shall be read as and are confined to the case of ‘Rohit Tandon vs Enforcement Directorate’,” read the order passed Monday.The Delhi high court judge also also ordered a “special messenger” to inform the chief editors of the the Hindu and the Indian Express of the development for “necessary compliance”. The two national dailies have been asked to issue a “clarification” in this regard in their respective editions on Tuesday.On Monday afternoon, the ED also moved the Delhi high court seeking rectification of the “inadvertent factual errors” and “accidental slips” in the order passed by the high court while deciding the bail plea filed by the former finance minister in the INX Media case.The Wire has also reported on how Justice Kait’s bail order also appears to reproduce parts of the ED’s counter-affidavit without appropriate referencing as well as a separate Supreme Court order on the Rohit Tandon case.