After a Day of Silence, Centre Finally Addresses Violent Clash at India-China Border

The Union government has been tight-lipped on the escalating situation between China and India since April.

New Delhi: It took a whole day for the prime minister and the Union defence minister Rajnath Singh to make their first comment on the Sino-Indian face-off in eastern Ladakh. Even as the Indian Army confirmed first that 20 soldiers, including a colonel-rank officer, were killed by China’s People’s Liberation Army, the usually-vocal Narendra Modi refrained from making a statement. His cabinet ministers also remained conspicuous by their silence, even as the Indian Army, in different press statements, raised the death toll from three on Tuesday afternoon to 20 by late evening.

On Wednesday afternoon, the PMO broke its silence and tweeted that Prime Minister Modi has called an all-party meeting to discuss the “situation in the India-China border areas”. 

Minutes before, the Union defence minister also gave his first response by expressing his grief for the death of Indian soldiers. 

Later in the day, Modi also said that he wouldn’t let the “sacrifice of the Indian soldiers go in vain”, and that India was well-placed to give a fitting reply to China. He warned that if provoked, Indian will not compromise with its “integrity and sovereignty”, and that it can prove its strength and capabilities anytime. 

However, the prime minister’s statements came after almost two months of silence on the issue. The Union government has been tight-lipped on the escalating situation between China and India since end-April, when intelligence reports first came in about possible Chinese army buildups across the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in eastern Ladakh. Over the last few days, the government has insisted that though a tense situation prevailed in the India-China borders, both the countries were attempting to de-escalate. It also said that both armies have decided to disengage from the border areas, and indicated that the status-quo on LAC continued to be maintained. 

Also Read: India Capable of Giving ‘Fitting Reply When Provoked’, Says Modi on Violent Clash With China

However, the death of 20 soldiers amidst such assurances had the opposition parties clamouring. While saying that the whole country stood as one, they demanded that the Union government should at least indicate the enormity of the situation and asked for some clarity over whether Indian “territorial integrity” was indeed breached by the Chinese army. It also enquired why both the armies clashed on Tuesday if they had decided to disengage.

Apart from the Congress party leaders, many others, including forme prime minister H.D. Devegowda, Samajwadi Party’s Akhilesh Yadav, and Rashtriya Janata Dal spokesperson Manoj Kumar Jha, also raised questions. 

Akhilesh Yadav said that the government is expected to “tell the truth” in the matter at least to pay its respect to the slain soldiers. While expressing his solidarity with the government on issues of national security, he posted a few parliamentary speeches by his father Mulayam Singh Yadav in which he had raised dangers posed by China in the border areas.  

Other opposition leaders also pitched in to pay their tribute to the dead soldiers and show its support to the government but urged it to clear the air around the matter.

However, on Tuesday, even as the air was filled with uncertainty, the government let the pliant big media do the talking, much of which was speculative in nature. While a television channel attempted to bail out the government by putting the onus on the Indian army, some blamed the opposition parties for asking tough questions to the government. Then there were those who thought asking questions on the situation was “petty politics”.

Even as reporters tried to dig deep and collate information from the available facts and their trusted sources in the Army, there was still no clarity over what the situation was, mostly because of the government’s reticence to take questions on the issue. This further fuelled speculations, with many television anchors advocating a war with China

Late Tuesday evening, ANI reported that the death toll has been higher on the Chinese side, and cited unnamed sources to report that 43 Chinese soldiers were killed by the Indian army as compared to 20 casualties on the Indian side. However, there was no confirmation of this either by the Union government or any other international media. Security experts like K.C. Singh went on to take a dig at the ANI report. “NSA & his agencies can intercept PLA comms to find details about Chinese soldiers killed but not PLA crossing LAC into acknowledged Indian valleys,” Singh commented on Twitter

However, this seemed enough for the BJP IT cell to toe a similar political line on the sensitive matter. Since ANI’s report, social media has been flooded with messages and GIFs that say the casualties on the Chinese side were higher than India, in what is a clear attempt to stoke hyper-nationalist emotions. This swell on social media was led by none other than the BJP IT cell chief Amit Malviya. 

This narrative was given further fillip when the prime minister in his address on Wednesday said that our soldiers “maarte maarte marein (died while killing)”.

Where were BJP big-wigs on Tuesday when information was at a loss? 

Immediately after the PMO called for an all-party meet, most BJP top leaders and Modi’s cabinet ministers were quick to express remorse at the deaths of Indian soldiers. However, this was preceded by a full day of marked silence. 

Let’s see how the two most important ministers who are supposed to be handling this national security crisis responded even as the India-China border dispute escalated. 

Also Read: After Violent Clash, China Claims Sovereignty Over Galwan Valley for First Time in Decades

Union home minister Amit Shah posted multiple times on Twitter on June 15  about his meetings regarding COVID-19 containment efforts with Delhi government leaders and officials.

On Tuesday, however, he only retweeted the prime minister’s speech during his virtual interaction with chief ministers on COVID-19. 

On the other hand, the Union defence minister’s silence was rather stark. He posted multiple pictures of his “Jan Samvad” virtual political rally for Uttarakhand on June 15, when the situation must have been tense at the Sino-Indian border. On June 16, he did not post a single message on Twitter.  

He spoke about how the BJP-led government in the hill state took steps to ease pilgrimages to Mansarovar, then he went on to talk about misunderstandings between Nepal and India and alerted people that the relationship between the two countries was not ordinary and that the two countries shared roti-beti (bread-and-daughter)” kind of a equation.  

He also spoke about how the dilution of Article 370 had made Jammu and Kashmir a “truly secular region”.