Aid experts warn that the world’s West-dominated aid structure will fail those most in need unless it acknowledges the role of local organisations.
London: The world’s “self-interested” international aid system must give local charities a greater role in shaping responses to humanitarian disasters or it will fail to assist those most in need, aid experts warned on Tuesday.
The remarks by a London-based think tank, the Overseas Development Institute (ODI), were targeted at UN agencies, governments and private sector companies preparing to debate changes to the aid system at the World Humanitarian Summit in May.
Opinions are divided over the role of local charities in a reformed aid sector that has long been dominated by Western donors, the Red Cross movement and UN agencies and is now struggling to fund assistance to a record 90 million people in need.
“We need a radical transformation with the big players acknowledging the role of local organisations and other providers, otherwise the Western dominated aid structure will progressively become irrelevant,” the ODI’s humanitarian director, Sara Pantuliano, told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.
A report co-authored by Pantuliano, published on Tuesday, said the entire sector was too self-interested and preoccupied with growth, market share and output, rather than on achieving positive outcomes for beneficiaries.
“Despite the dedication of frontline aid workers, who work tirelessly and often at great personal risk, (…) these enduring, but outdated assumptions compel organisations to be competitive, rather than collaborative,” the report said.
Aid groups based in developing countries want the May summit in Istanbul to agree what proportion of global humanitarian funding should go to national and local non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and a target date for this to be done.
Their share of the total funding pie halved to 0.2% in 2014 from 0.4% in 2012, and their share of the money received by all NGOs also fell to 1.2%, according to the Britain-based research group Development Initiatives.
Under a separate “Charter for Change,” 18 international charities so far, including Christian Aid and Islamic Relief Worldwide, have agreed to put into practice by May 2018 eight commitments to boost the role of national agencies.
They include passing 20% of humanitarian funding down to that level.
On top of channeling more funding to local players, UN agencies and large international NGOs should also focus on “enabling” smaller, local organisations to respond in disaster situations, the ODI report said.
One of the world’s largest humanitarian charities, Care International, said it largely agreed with the proposal, but said global charities had an important role due to their scale.
“We believe it’s still essential for international NGOs to retain the ability to deliver services,” said Gareth Price-Jones, Care International’s humanitarian policy and advocacy coordinator.
“Being international means we can maintain a pool of skilled staff and supplies which can be deployed anywhere in the world as needed,” he added.
Major government donors, including Britain, have shown interest in expanding the work done by local NGOs, but regulations and anti-terror laws often restrict who they can fund.
The UN chief Ban Ki-moon has also made clear that world leaders must change the way they handle humanitarian crises, which are taking an unprecedented toll on civilians.
The UN office for the coordination of humanitarian affairs has estimated 88.7 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance in 2016, which will cost an estimated $20.1 billion.
“The scale of humanitarian needs at this time is just extraordinary and we must accept our shared responsibilities,” the UN Secretary-General said in February.
Pantuliano said attempts to overhaul the system and to increase the role of local NGOs had so far looked like “tinkering”, with smaller charities being used as sub-contractors rather than partners.
She said there needed to be changes to the underlying structure and culture on which the system operates.
“If we do not emerge from the World Humanitarian Summit with some clear and tangible commitments on how to reshape the aid sector it will never deliver on its ambitions,” Pantuliano said.
(Thomson Reuters Foundation)