Muzaffarnagar DM, SSP Oppose Yogi’s Attempt to Drop Riot Cases Against BJP Politicians

With the courts taking cognisance of several crimes, district officials say the state government cannot withdraw those cases unilaterally.

File photo of policemen standing in street of riot-affected Muzaffarnagar in 2013. Credit: PTI

Muzaffarnagar (UP): District authorities here are not in favour of withdrawal of the cases, mostly against political leaders, related to the Muzaffarnagar riots of 2013 in which over 60 people were killed and over 40,000 rendered homeless, official sources said here on Saturday.

The district authorities, in response to two letters from the Uttar Pradesh department of justice, have advocated against the withdrawal of 10 such cases as the court has already taken cognisance against the accused after charge sheets were filed by the police and the special investigation team (SIT) probing the riots cases, the sources said.

Some of the cases were filed against UP minister Suresh Rana, former Union minister Sanjiv Balyan, MP Bhartendu Singh, MLA Umesh Malik and BJP leader Sadhvi Prachi.

In two letters to the Muzaffarnagar district magistrate, the Uttar Pradesh department of justice had sought information on 13 points, including whether the cases could be withdrawn in public interest.

The district authorities have opposed the proposal in the interest of justice, on the recommendation of the district prosecution department, the sources said.

The accused are facing charges under various sections of the Indian Penal Code for violating prohibitory orders, deterring public servants from discharging their duties and wrongful restraint.

The accused had allegedly participated in a ‘mahapanchayat’ and incited violence through their speeches in the last week of August 2013.

The communal clashes in Muzaffarnagar and adjoining areas in August and September 2013 had claimed more than 60 lives while over 40,000 people were displaced.


Liked the story? We’re a non-profit. Make a donation and help pay for our journalism.
  • Ek Aur India

    Glad to see there are many in the system that still have a spine eft. Well done! officers.

  • Amitabha Basu

    According to law, the public prosecutor alone can withdraw cases, and the judge has to satisfy himself/herself that the reasons for withdrawal of cases are proper as per law. It is a different matter that most public prosecutors, appointed by the government, bend to the government’s dictates and the judges are also compliant enough to the government’s wishes. Here, the Muzaffarnagar DM and SSP deserve praise for their courage and sense of justice.