External Affairs

New Sanctions Imposed by UN Security Council on North Korea

The UN Security Council unanimously imposed new sanctions on North Korea on Friday for its November 29 intercontinental ballistic missile test.

US Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley attends the Security Council session on imposing new sanctions on North Korea, in New York, US, December 22, 2017. Credit: Reuters/Amr Alfiky

UN/Seoul: The UN Security Council unanimously imposed new sanctions on North Korea on Friday for its November 29 intercontinental ballistic missile test, seeking to limit its access to refined petroleum products and crude oil and its earnings from workers abroad.

A Security Council resolution adopted 15-0 seeks to ban nearly 90% of refined petroleum product exports to North Korea (DPRK) by capping them at 500,000 barrels a year and, in a last-minute change, demands the repatriation of North Koreans working abroad within 24 months, instead of 12 months as first proposed.

The US-drafted resolution also caps crude oil supplies to DPRK at four million barrels a year and commits the Council to further reductions if Pyongyang were to conduct another nuclear test or launch another intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM).

North Korea on November 29 said it successfully tested a new ICBM in a “breakthrough” that puts the US mainland within range of its nuclear weapons whose warheads could withstand re-entry to the Earth’s atmosphere.

Tensions have been rising over DPRK’s nuclear and missile programmes, which it pursues in defiance of years of Security Council resolutions, with bellicose rhetoric coming from both Pyongyang and the White House.

In November, DPRK demanded a halt to what it called “brutal sanctions,” saying a previous round imposed after its sixth and most powerful nuclear test on September 3 constituted genocide.

US diplomats have made clear they are seeking a diplomatic solution but proposed the new, tougher sanctions resolution to ratchet up pressure on DPRK leader Kim Jong Un.

“It sends the unambiguous message to Pyongyang that further defiance will invite further punishments and isolation,” Nikki Haley, the US ambassador to the UN, said after the vote.

The North Korean mission to the UN did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the vote.

Wu Haitao, China’s deputy UN ambassador, said tensions on the Korean peninsula risk “spiraling out of control” and he repeated Beijing’s call for talks.

“Only by meeting each other halfway and through dialogue and consultations can a peaceful settlement be found,” he said.

DPRK regularly threatens to destroy South Korea, the US and Japan and says its weapons programmes are necessary to counter US aggression. The US stations 28,500 troops in the South, a legacy of the 1950-53 Korean War.

On Friday, a spokesperson for DPRK‘s foreign ministry called US President Donald Trump’s recently released national security strategy the latest American policy seeking to “stifle our country and turn the entire Korean peninsula” into an outpost of American hegemony.

He said Trump was seeking “total subordination of the whole world.”

Increasing pressure

Speaking before the Security Council vote, analysts said the new sanctions could have a major effect on DPRK’s economy.

“If they were enforced, the cap on oil would be devastating for DPRK‘s haulage industry, for North Koreans who use generators at home or for productive activities and for (state-owned enterprises) that do the same,” said Peter Ward, a columnist for NK News, a website that tracks DPRK.

The forced repatriation of foreign workers would also cut off vital sources of foreign currency and investment not only for the government but also for DPRK‘s emerging market economy, he said.

China, which supplies most of DPRK‘s oil, has backed successive rounds of UN sanctions but had resisted past US calls to cut off supplies to its neighbour.

The move to curb Chinese fuel exports to DPRK may have limited impact after China National Petroleum Corp suspended diesel and gasoline sales to its northern neighbour in June, over concerns it would not get paid.

Business has slowed steadily since then, with zero shipments of diesel, gasoline and other fuel from China in October. November data will be released on Monday.

Russia quietly boosted economic support for DPRK earlier this year, and last week Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Igor Morgulov said Moscow was not ready to sign up to sanctions that would strangle the country economically.

In a bid to further choke DPRK‘s external sources of funding, the resolution also seeks to ban North Korean exports of food products, machinery, electrical equipment, earth and stone, including magnesite and magnesia, wood and vessels.

It also bans exports to DPRK of industrial equipment, machinery, transportation vehicles and industrial metals, as well as subjecting 15 North Koreans and the Ministry of the People’s Armed Forces to a global asset freeze and travel ban.

It also seeks to allow countries to seize, inspect and freeze any vessel in their ports or territorial waters that they believe was carrying banned cargo or involved in prohibited activities.

Even if the proposed sanctions have an economic effect, it is not clear whether that would push Pyongyang to negotiate or stop its weapons development, said Kim Sung-han, a former South Korean vice foreign minister.

“We have had numerous – sometimes so-called toughest – sanctions against North Korea over the past 25 years,” he said. “Almost none have worked effectively to halt the regime’s military and nuclear ambitions.”


Join The Discussion