International Federation of Journalists Expresses Concern Over Defamation Case Against The Wire

“The IFJ is concerned over the misuse of the criminal defamation to harass journalists and media to stop them for investigating matters of public interest and publication of critical stories.”

Jay Shah, Amit Shah. Credit: PTI

Amit Shah and son Jay Shah. Credit: PTI

New Delhi: The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ), a group of journalists from across the world that promotes press freedom, has expressed concern over the criminal defamation case filed by Jay Amitbhai Shah, BJP president Amit Shah’s son, against The Wire. The case was filed after The Wire published an investigative report detailing the sudden rise in the turnover of a company owned by Jay after the Narendra Modi government came to power.

The organisation’s statement is reproduced in full below.


The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) is concerned over the filing of a criminal defamation case against seven persons including the reporter and editors of online news portal The Wire, on October 9.

Businessman Jay Shah filed a criminal defamation case in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, against reporter Rohini Singh and Siddharth Varadarajan, Sidharth Bhatia and MK Venu, editors of the news portal for the report ‘The Golden Touch of Jay Amit Shah’ highlighting a dramatic increase in some of his businesses since Narendra Modi became prime minister. The story based on annual filings of Shah’s companies with the Registrar of the Companies, was published by The Wire, a not-for-profit independent news website. Jay Shah is a son of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) president Amit Shah.

statement issued by Shah stated: “Since the website has proceeded in making an absolutely false imputation in a highly slanted article thereby damaging my reputation I have decided to prosecute Author, Editor/(s) and the Owner/(s) of the aforesaid news website for criminal defamation and sue them for an amount of Rs. 100 crores… If anyone else republish/re-broadcast the imputations made in the said article, whether directly or indirectly, such person or entity will also be guilty of the very same criminal and/or civil liability.”

Also read: Jay Amit Shah’s Case Against The Wire Is an Attempt to Censor, Intimidate Media at Large

The IFJ notes that The Wire sent queries to Shah for clarifications before publication of the story and his lawyer warned against publication of story and threatened legal consequences, including to anyone who shared the story. The story had about 136,000 shares in about a few hours of it going live.

On a different case of criminal defamation, a court stayed defamation proceedings initiated against The Wire by Essel Group for an article after the business group owned by MP Subhash Chandra withdrew the complaint. The Wire had maintained that matters of record in the public domain carried in public interest cannot amount to defamation.

The IFJ said: “The IFJ is concerned over the misuse of the criminal defamation to harass journalists and media to stop them for investigating matters of public interest and publication of critical stories. While the IFJ is confident that the court will ensure justice, the trend of filing criminal defamation cases for critical news is a matter of concern as it puts financial and psychological burden on media and journalists; and can create a chilling effect. The IFJ also calls for decriminalization of defamation by making defamation only civil offence.”

  • Anjan Basu

    The Modi govt has notched up an impressive record of denunciations, reproaches and condemnations by various international agencies and organisations. At the same time, India’s performance/position on various human development parameters is on a steady decline. Unless we are able to throw out this bigoted, inept, moronic bunch from positions of power, India may soon approach a pariah state’s status in the international community.

  • The Wire

    No typo. Says “for” and not “from” in the IFJ statement

  • S.N.Iyer

    Whatever the outcome of this defamation suit , it seems to have become a regular feature. An article on a case involving Mr Adani” Company in reproducing the facts on a case was threatened with a legal suit and the publishers developed cold feet and withdrew the article and the Editor had to resign. The purpose of this threat of a legal case is to try and pressurise the publishers and writers getting involved in a long drawn case causing personal inconvenience and cost which the rich companies can afford. This same tactic has been used in cases against those involved in cases connected with the 2002 riots and some ” fake” encounter cases.