Communalism

Kashmiri Pandits Are a Pawn in the Games of Hindutva Forces

File photo of agitation by members of All Parties Migrants Co-ordination Committee (APMCC) and Kashmiri Pandits Sangarsh Samiti ( KPSS) . Credit: PTI

File photo of agitation by members of All Parties Migrants Co-ordination Committee (APMCC) and Kashmiri Pandits Sangarsh Samiti ( KPSS). Credit: PTI

I recently appeared on the Al Jazeera Head to Head programme where I was a panellist for Mehdi Hasan’s interview of BJP/RSS veteran Ram Madhav. Among the topics discussed (relating to the BJP/RSS ideology of Hindutva), was the issue of Kashmir. I am a Kashmiri woman, a feminist, author of a novel called Residue (with Kashmiri protagonists), and an academic who has, for over a decade and a half, worked on issues of identity, political economy, Kashmir and Bhutan.

So, here’s my question – in contemporary Indian discourse, what does it mean for a Kashmiri Pandit woman to speak in non-communal terms about the history and politics of Kashmir? Like the eminent Malayalam critic stopped from writing on Ramayana because he was reduced to being “just a Muslim”, it means – in the climate of communalism – I can only be KP in the sense of “Kashmiri Pandit”, but not Kashmiri and Proud, or Kashmiri and Progressive.

As soon as I mentioned the internationally well-documented travesty of justice in Kashmir (militarisation, extra-judicial killings, rapes, enforced disappearances, draconian legislation such as the Armed Forces Special Powers Act or AFSPA), a fellow panellist on the show — academic Gautam Sen, a former spokesman, Overseas Friends of the BJP — accused me of being a “representative of the Pakistani Embassy”, a shockingly defamatory remark for which he refused to apologise. I objected to this, pointing out that this was about human rights and he would know my stance on Balochistan if we were discussing Pakistan. And before I had a chance to complete my intervention, Ram Madhav said that he expected me to focus on Kashmiri Hindus, to which I replied that all Kashmiris have suffered, regardless of their religion.

Some of these exchanges are not on the final programme, but anyone who has heard me speak or read my work on Kashmir would know that I stand for Kashmiriyat and oppose the communalisation of Kashmiri identity. As I said towards the end of the programme: Kashmir is not “owned” by India or Pakistan. Yet, both these postcolonial nations are interested in the territory of Kashmir, not the Kashmiris themselves, who have been made a pawn in the mutual power-posturing.

Since the programme aired, I have been at the receiving end of abuse on email, Twitter, Facebook and on the phone. I’ve been slandered variously (pro-Jihadi, ISIS supporter, blot on Hinduism etc), called and texted by trolls at 2am, received threats of death and legal action, been accused of being funded by West/ISIS/Sonia Gandhi/Pakistan/Arabs, and warned to expect a further campaign of hate speech. In addition, I’ve experienced the special subcontinental version of misogyny and sexism reserved for critical female commentators in the public sphere (called a prostitute, whore, daughter of a bitch, victim of Love Jihad etc). 

Intimidation in Indian politics and society is not new. A long time ago, at Delhi University, when I stood in the college elections for the President of the Economics Society at Shriram College of Commerce (SRCC), I received phone calls suggesting that I withdraw my candidature if I didn’t want to be raped or physically attacked. But it is with my spoken and written work on Kashmir that I have come to be well-acquainted with (Kashmiri) Hindu right wing bigots who send numerous messages threatening, accusing and abusing me and my family in specific terms. The general gist of their venom is that Kashmiri Muslims need to be shown their place.

Trolls and super patriots

These trolls, the bhakts, the self-appointed ‘super patriots’ of an increasingly intolerant strand of politics have a special constituency among the Kashmiri Hindus who have been radicalised by Hindutva forces over the last two decades since they were forced to flee Kashmir in fear, due to killings and intimidation from Kashmiri militants. KPs have suffered trauma, poverty, forced exile and deaths in camps. But, should this make them unable to recognise what the Indian state has done to Kashmiri Muslims?

KPs and KMs, both of whom have become increasingly polarised, should recognise their common historical identity as Kashmiris (who, like Kashmiris of all religions and regions) have been let down by the postcolonial states in their pursuit of — at various times in post-independence British India — authoritarian-paternalistic/anti-communist/communal/militarist/mercenary agendas. The Kashmiri Pandit issue is used by Hindutva ideologues to bash and demonise (Kashmiri) Muslims. Ultimately, for the Hindutva forces, what they see as the inherently traitorous nature of Kashmiri Muslims qua Muslims is more problematic than even a Muslim majoritarian state such as a clearly ‘Islamic’ Republic of Pakistan. The Hindutva forces stand to gain from the simmering conflict by selectively timing the political leverage that they can gain from this communal divide of Kashmiris. Maybe this is why JeM (Jaish-e-Mohammed) attacks are attributed by Narendra Modi to enemies of humanity when they happen in Pathankot (and though a Union Minister claims there is credible evidence that they were planned in Pakistan), but similar attacks in Kashmir are the work of Pakistani terrorists that justify draconian laws and affect peace talks.

Apart from a selective reading of history (that ignores events like the 1947 Jammu Massacre or the 1987 elections), pursuing an inconsistent policy, and failing to challenge the buildup over time of a diverse array of vested interests, the Hindutva position has been to propose problematic policies (separate townships for the return of KPs) and project the constitutionally enshrined special status of Kashmir (Article 370, whose provisions have been progressively diluted) as appeasement. 

Political expediency

The political expediency of the PDP-BJP alliance currently in power is just the latest in the series of ‘Mandarin- Machiavelli interactions’ engineered to enable Hindutva forces to make further inroads into J&K. This year a Muharram procession in Srinagar was once again banned while the RSS marched with weapons in Jammu. As Haseeb Drabu — who worked with Ram Madhav on forging the PDP-BJP coalition — has said, “nothing can prevent RSS from coming to Jammu & Kashmir“. The RSS-backed Muslim Rashtriya Manch (MRM) is planning a large convention in Srinagar in May 2016. Even after the terrible times Kashmiris have seen, there is more miserable politicking ahead.

The Indian government’s inability and unwillingness to face the facts on Kashmir was evident in Ram Madhav’s statement that the only outstanding issue for him was the status of Pakistan Occupied Kashmir. This is reflected in the maps in India which show J&K as including Gilgit-Baltistan (and areas under Chinese control), without so much as a reference to the the Line of Control; in the refusal to abrogate emergency laws after over two decades; the refusal to accept that Pakistan infiltrated militancy aside, there is a resilient indigenous demand for azaadi that has survived the quelling of the militancy and the promises of development. How can there be the political resolution of an issue through dialogue when there is no recognition of realities on the ground?

As a Hindu majoritarian, revanchist attitude gains ground, the space for honourable dissent in the Indian democratic public sphere is diminished in a thousand ways. The right wing populism of the BJP and its Sangh parivar affiliates has constructed and legitimated anti-minority resentment to create an idea of Hindus as “the people”; a virtuous, homogenous entity that is acting against a purported establishment and is justified in having a certain contempt towards the substance of a democratic functioning. In many significant aspects, the Hindutva understanding of the political follows Carl Schmitt, the influential German Nazi jurist and theorist, who supported political authoritarianism and saw the essence of the political as the antagonism of the friend/enemy distinction. This manufactured antagonism against the Other (us versus them) can be most sharply drawn in Kashmir where the Other combines Muslim with aggressor/threat/pro-Pakistani.

It is up to Kashmiris – in whose name the toxic Hindutva agenda functions – and all conscientious Indians  to continue to say ‘Not in my name’ when the organised state apparatus acts to polarise, oppress, and deny people their just aspirations.

Nitasha Kaul is a novelist and Assistant Professor of Politics and International Relations at Westminster University

  • Anil Maheshwari

    Xenophobia is not alone restricted to any one community, region or country. However, it is more evident among the Kashmiri Pandits, It was only after their recent exodus in 1989-90 that they have started calling themselves as Kashmiri Hindus.

    • Piyush

      KPs are not pawn, they are helpless. Being Right Wing is a matter of
      survival for them.Not them, this lady author here has become a pawn in
      the hands of separatists/islamists.

  • Abdul Majid Zargar

    A thought provoking article from real ‘Daughter of vithasta’.As she clearly points out that Kashmiri Pandiths are increasingly becoming pawns in the hands of rightwing Hindu fascist forces and the process has already thrown up few charlatans or merchants of hate from KP community with the only agenda of demonising Kashmiri Muslims.

    • Kumar

      Aren’t all kashmiris children of Vashista?

    • indianHeart

      kashmir also belongs to the kashmir pandiths who were forced out of kashmir

  • sasboy

    Justice for all regardless of who they are. All Kashmiris have suffered a great deal over the past few decades.

  • Kumar

    Logically a very weak article. Author is contradicting her own reasons by painting anybody who oppose her views in one color.

  • indianHeart

    what about people who want to join India in Pakistan occupied Kashmir???

  • indianHeart

    If there is a referendum now… majority of Kashmiris will join India

    • Kaeshur

      Why doesnt indian hold the referrendum then. or are they afraid?

  • indianHeart

    stop playing the victim card and face the reality… Pakistan has kept terrorism alive in Kashmir, if military is removed Kashmir will become ISIS… majority of the people in Kashmir want to be part of India – this is the reality

    • delta1980

      Recognizing the reality and being patriotic at the same time is difficult and you seem to be struggling with the reality. Giving a high degree of autonomy to Kashmir as China does to HK is the best we can hope for as Indians. Dont let your hyper nationalism blind you.

      • indianHeart

        Kashmir rightfully belongs to India , Pakistan has no claim over it… Pakistan and International organisations have misused India’s patience and love for peace… it we keep going on this road there will be more attacks on Indian soil just like Mumbai, until and unless India stands strong and give very body a strong reply…all international countries agree Pak is a terror country, still they do nothing.

  • indianHeart

    one sided article without complete picture of the other half

  • Civilized

    How could this writer be so naive.J&K belongs to India. The multicultural tolerant ethos of J&K is akin to India’s. Some Sunni youth wave Pak flag, but they also wave ISIS, LeT flags, they are free to leave.
    And about the presence of security forces. Why is army in J&K in the first place, why aren’t they present in Punjab anymore. Because of terrorists.

  • Civilized

    And the abuse she gets is wrong, but it shows the attachment Indians have with J&K. It is amplified because of India’s large population. Just like people who say she is pro-ISIS, Ms.Kaul also abuses people who contradict her by calling them names like “Hindutva extremists”. Self hating will get her awards in London’s academic circle, but not in India, we have bled everyday because of Pakistani terrorism.

  • Piyush

    OK. So after all this outpouring of contempt towards “evil hindutva”(the supposed ‘other’ for the ‘liberal’ you), I have only one question which you have overlooked in your narrative of victim-hood and wrongdoings by an evil nation-state:
    What is the road ahead/solution for Kashmiri Pandits according to you? How will the justice be done to them?

  • Sandeep

    May I ask you a question ? Read Rahul Pandita book. At the Nandi Marg massacre of Kashmiri Hindus the lone survivor who had hidden himself in fields told Rahul Pandita that when a lone child was crying whose parents had been shot dead one terrorist told the other I Kashmiri make the child to silence … And came a volley of fire & it was silence there? So what happens to them is not your subject of discussion? why? What has happens to Minority in conflict zones have you analyzed it?

    In case of Muslims the narrative is Kashmir conflict? In case of Muslims it is a conflict because they want to be part of Muslim majority state Why are Hindus then the pawns by same political ideology if they
    want to be part of Hindu Majority state, how are they politically In-correct?

    Writer Have some common-sense analysis?

  • Nomad

    Its a very immature article that clearly exposes the writer`s bias towards India and Hindus perhaps to score some browny points. As it is very fashionable to criticise Hindus and Indian government that gets these small time ” chillar writers”, international diases of useless forums.The very fact KP`s were exiled due to their religious identity by Muslims of kashmir apart from the islamic terrorists, makes them stand apart from KM`s. The religious identity was thrust on them, and the writer as expected failed to question the freedom of speech and right to be with india for Kashmiri Pundits. She fails to get into the real reasons of exodus of the original natives of Kashmir by some converts and invaders believing in Islamic fundamentalists. She also refuses to acknoeldge that Hindu minority has always been at receiving end in secular India. KP`s have always been bullied by the muslims, drawing strength from their numbers. Hindus were massacred during 1947 tribal raids just because they were hindu`s..The kashmir problem is primarily the outcome of two nation theory that eminates from Hindu vs Muslims, so to say Hindus are pawns in the hands of Hidnutava forces is foolish and childish. There is no secularims in Kashmir and one is force to wear its religion on its sleeves. Seems like the Author is confused or cunning to depict the suffering of a community that chose to betray the nation and is communal to the core. We need more balanced and mature writers, that will provide some credibility to the portal.

  • Salman M Khan

    Nitasha Kaul should have included some parts from her “Mandarin-Machiavelli interaction” article. Here goes. “There are structures of power and responsibility (in Kashmir) that do not overlap meaningfully. The bureaucrats and politicians at the centre do not have direct interaction with the regions; their interest is only to have a ‘reliable’ power base in the peripheral regions of Kashmir, which comes from the administration at the centre depending on local elites in these peripheral regions. Equally, the local elites in the periphery exaggerate reports of their influence over ‘their’ people in order to gain maximum advantage from the centre. This pattern of (what can be called) Mandarin-Machiavelli interaction has characterised the relationship of India with Kashmir (or rather of New Delhi with Srinagar). Neither the centre nor the peripheral elites have any interest in being genuinely concerned about the people in whose name they wield power and exercise authority.

  • Pingback: From funerals to freedom for Kashmir: undoing the Great Indian Democracy | Awaam by Vision21()

  • Pingback: From funerals to freedom for Kashmir: undoing the Great Indian Democracy | EYEZINE()