Economy

Modi Government’s ‘Clarification’ on Tax Data Further Muddies the Demonetisation Waters

Instead of waiting for all the data to come in and making an apples-with-apples comparison, are different numbers being thrown at the public in order to make a political point about the ‘success’ of demonetisation?

File photo of finance minister at the finance ministry. Credit: PTI/Vijay Verma

On August 18, the Ministry of Finance issued a clarification about the number of tax payers that had been added post-demonetisation, hoping to set at rest the confusion – and skepticism – that had resulted from four different numbers being quoted by the prime minister, the finance minister, the Economic Survey and the Central Board of Direct Taxes.

Of course, the  tax payer numbers claimed – of 56 lakhs, 5.4 lakhs, 91 lakhs and 33 lakhs – were quite confusing and perplexing. Friday’s press release said that these numbers denote nothing but “different period and different type of taxpayers”. The maze that the government has laid out is literally difficult for any fact-checker to navigate. Even then, let me try to decode this puzzle.

56 lakhs: The number quoted in Prime Minister Modi’s speech

First, let me dissect the clarification given to the statement made by the prime minister. The clarification is as follows:

“The Prime Minister’s speech referred to the increase in number of e-filed Personal Income Tax Returns (ITRs) filed from 1st April, 2017 to 5th August, 2017 over the ITRs filed in corresponding period of earlier years. The data maintained by the IT Department shows that during 1st April, 2017 to 5th August, 2017, 2.79 crore e-returns of Individual taxpayers were received as against 2.23 crore e-returns received during 1st April, 2016 to 5th August, 2016. Thus, the additional ITRs received in 2017 works out to be 56 lakh. During the same period of 20152.00 crore e-returns were received, meaning thereby, that in 2016, only 22 lakh (rounded off)) additional e-returns were received by the due date of filing. This data has already been put in public domain by CBDT’s Press Release dated 7th August, 2017.” (Emphasis added)

Now let us examine the prime minister’s speech to see exactly what he has said:

“The number of new taxpayers filing income tax returns from April 01 to August 05 is 56 lakhs while in the same period last year only 22 lakh filed the returns. In a way it has more than doubled. This is the result of our fight against black money.”

Nowhere in the above statement is the prime minister specifically comparing e-returns – as clarified by the Ministry of Finance. Instead, he is speaking about new tax payers without qualifying whether they are filing e-returns. Also the CBDT press release of August 7 mentioned in the August 18 press release also does not mention e-returns.

This is the same press release, which was carried by most newspapers with banner headlines claiming that demonetisation had led to a huge jump of 24% in income tax returns. In my last article on the subject, I dealt with this issue in detail. Since the government is now insisting that the numbers are a comparison of e-returns, let us compare the growth of e-filing for the last couple of years from the table provided in the Annual Report of the finance ministry (FY 2015-16, Page 228).

The report explains:

“Electronic filing of I-T returns over the internet picked up from AY 2006-07 and the number of returns filed electronically has risen from around 4 Lakh in Financial Year, 2006-07 to 341.73 Lakh in Financial Year 2014-15. In Financial Year, 2015-16, nearly 309.53 Lakh returns were received up to 31st December, 2015 as compared to 243.31 Lakh returns for same period in Financial Year 2014-15, representing a growth of around 27.22%.”

We can see from the above table that the growth of e-returns saw a year-on-year growth of 74%, 79%, 31% and 38.67%  during the last 4 financial years of Manmohan Singh’s UPA-2 (2010-2014). I leave it to the reader’s judgment whether the 24% hike in e-returns last year – that too based on a selective period – can be considered phenomenal.

5.4 lakhs: The number quoted in the Economic Survey

This is the clarification given by Ministry of Finance about this number.

“The analysis given in Table-6 on page 22 of the Economic Survey (Vol.2) is based on the data for the period of 9th November to 31st March of 2016-17 and corresponding periods of last two financial years. Moreover, the growth in the number of taxpayers discussed in the Economic Survey is based on the number of new taxpayers assuming the previous year’s growth rate as the reference growth rate. On the other hand, the growth of Individual return-filers referred to in PM’s speech is with respect to new as well as old taxpayers. Thus, the data used in Economic Survey is different from data referred to in PM’s speech in respect of the period of filing as well as the type of taxpayers and the two are not comparable.”

This is one exercise done by Arvind Subramanian, chief economic advisor, which can be considered close to the truth as far as the real growth in the number of new tax payers is concerned. I have dealt with this in detail in my last article. My take is that if the Economic Survey has indeed compared the new tax payers added during FY 2016-17 (80.7 lakhs) with the number added during FY 2014-15 (76.04 lakh), then the above number of 5.4 lakhs will further shrink!

91 lakhs: The number quoted by the finance minister

The clarification by Ministry of Finance for this amazing number of 91 lakhs is as follows:

“The statement of the Finance Minister regarding addition of 91 lakh taxpayers to the tax-base referred to the total number of new returns filed during the entire financial year 2016-17 and therefore, it is neither comparable to the data in PM’s speech nor with the data in Economic Survey (different period and different type of taxpayers).”

First of all, most media reported in unison that the finance minister on May 17, 2017 had talked about the number of tax payers post demonetisation, not for the entire financial year as his ministry’s clarification seeks to suggest now. This is evident from the news headlines of that day – Times of IndiaHuffington PostNDTVLive MintNew Indian ExpressDeccan Chronicle, India Today and Zee News – none of which the government controverted.

Another question is that while the Economic Survey puts the total number of tax payers for the entire financial year 2016-17 as 80.7 lakhs (See Para 1.85, Page 22, Economic Survey, Vol.2) , the new clarification of 91 lakhs pertaining to the same financial year does not hold water. Both figures cannot be right.

33 lakhs: The number given in the Rajya Sabha

Here, the ministry is now clarifying that the total number of returns filed between November 9, 2016 and March 31, 2017 is 1.96 crores and that this figure had been compared with the number of returns filed in the previous year during the same period, which comes to 1.63 crores.

This growth too is not phenomenal when you compare growth rates for the same period in earlier years. For data comparisons to be meaningful, we should look at the whole financial year rather than at data for a part of the year.

A final word

At the end of the day, there is only one custodian for all income tax-related data and that is the CBDT. The board is the institution which has been providing these figures to the prime minister, the finance minister, the chief economic advisor, etc. Instead of waiting for all the data to come in and making a simple apples-with-apples comparison, why has it been throwing different numbers at the people? Is the idea to use data selectively in order to justify demonetisation? This is the question that the CBDT must answer.

James Wilson is working with Inter State Water Advisory Committee of the Government of Kerala. He tweets @jamewils.

  • S.N.Iyer

    The writer has exposed one big issue. That the PM, the Finance Ministry are trying to confuse the lay people with contradictory figures – which may be referring to different periods- but it proves that this Govt and the PM included are giving false figures to justify their wrong actions. There was one mrte googlky by the FInance Minister when he asked the States to reduce the excise duties etc on petrol and diesel forgetting that the Centre has increase the excise duties 9 times since coming into power just to earn a large indirect revenue totaling well over Rs 3lac cr just to keep the fiscal deficit in check as their economic policies have failed to lift domestic investment or growth and therefore employment.

  • Anjan Basu

    Looks as though the govt now desperately wishes that the different versions of the’truth of the matter’ had not been conjured into existence. “As I was going up the stair/ I met a man who wasn’t there, / He wasn’t there again today, / I do so wish he’d go away”. One would think that the PM, the FM, the RBI, the CBDT and sundry other honourable representatives of the govt all feel this way now.