Caste

Hindu Groups in UK Hit Back at British Government’s Plans to Ban Caste-Based Discrimination

The Theresa May government, worried about upsetting powerful Hindu groups, is hesitating to go ahead with consultations on the caste discrimination issue.

British prime minister Teresa May at a temple during election campaigning. Credit: Reuters

London: Caste is rearing its ugly head again, this time in an unlikely place – the United Kingdom. Under pressure from rights groups and sections of civil society, the Theresa May government has moved to take its first steps towards banning caste-based discrimination in the public sphere. It has called for public opinions on whether caste discrimination will be best tackled by a ban on it through a new law or not, a consultation which will end on September 18, after which the government will take a final call.

However, the backlash from Hindu organisations, several of them close to the Sangh parivar, has been swift. They are livid at the government’s move and have threatened to derail it with all their might. This has now made the May government’s resolve in banning caste-based discrimination wobbly – it doesn’t want to appear to be taking on these vocal groups.

In fact, from at one time promising to ban caste discrimination in 2013, the May government has made an about-turn already, by now inviting public opinion on whether such a ban is even required. The government’s reluctance in biting the bullet on caste discrimination is now being seen as the surest sign of the ascent of the Hindu Right in the UK, a rise propelled by the financial clout of its British Hindu supporters and the tacit support of the Hindu Swayamsevak Sangh, the overseas wing of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, the far-right ideological parent of Modi’s BJP.

Currently, there are no laws in the UK to deal with cases of caste discrimination. While discrimination has largely been found in South Asian communities, especially in the British Indian – there is no legal provision to tackle it. As a result, victims have been forced to approach courts for justice, but with a mixed success rate.

A 2010 report commissioned by the British government laid bare the well-entrenched caste discrimination that exists amongst the Indian diaspora in the UK. The report highlighted many instances, from that of Indian-origin and former mayor of Coventry Ram Lakha alleging discrimination from the Indian community during his election because he belonged to the Chamar caste to a businessman seeing employees quit after he revealed that he belonged to the lower caste. In fact, the report details how certain sectors saw higher instances of such caste-based discrimination, especially education and the workplace.

Meena Varma, the UK director of the Dalit Solidarity Network, a grouping of individuals and groups fighting against caste discrimination, said there was enough evidence of caste discrimination but there is little respite. “If you have not been the victim of caste discrimination, then naturally you think it doesn’t exist. Sadly, for those that have suffered there is no remedy or redressal in the current provisions if they are discriminated against based on their caste.”

However, this position has been opposed by right-wing groups like the Hindu Council UK, which seeks to represent the interests of British Hindus in policymaking. “There is no caste-discrimination amongst us Indians – there might be some taunting [of people who belong to the lower castes] but nothing else,” said Anil Bhanot, its director.

In fact, these groups have called the government’s move an ‘interference’ and have now launched an incendiary attack on the campaign to ban discrimination. Their wrath is visible even in their criticism – these organisations are on record calling the campaign for a ban a ‘Christian conspiracy’, one meant to bring disrepute to India.

May’s apparent hesitation may have something to do with the post-Brexit scenario, according to a member of a pro-caste legislation group, who did not want to be identified. “It realises that India will be a crucial trade partner after Britain’s exit from the European Union trade market and it doesn’t want to upset these Hindu organisations which, it knows, yield enormous clout with the Modi regime.” Amrit Wilson, from the South Asia Solidarity Group, a human rights group, admits that the Hindu Right was consolidating steadily in the UK. “The Hindu Right has been getting more and more entrenched in this country, even though there is also huge opposition to them here.”

Hindu organisations realise this and are not pulling any punches. Bhanot, from the Hindu Council, hints that the Modi regime won’t take too kindly to the anti-caste legislation. “The Indian High Commission has communicated to us its unhappiness at such a move and so has most of the Indian community because we believe this is an attempt to embarrass India.”

Recently, in a sign of their proximity to the Modi regime, the right-wing National Council of Hindu Temples, UK, got senior BJP leader Subramanian Swamy to release its report on why it opposes the caste-based legislation. In its report, it called the campaign for a ban on caste discrimination a ‘hate crime against Hindus.’

The rising influence of these groups is propelled by multiple factors – financial, political and electoral. These groups enjoy financial clout and patronage by the wealthy business owners among the Hindu community. A 2017 report by Grant Thornton India pointed to how there were over 800 Indian-owned businesses with a turnover of over £5 million. Their combined revenues touched over £47 million and they employed over 110,000 people.

Electorally, the 800,000 strong British Hindu community is a significant player and has traditionally favoured Labour, a pattern which now seems to be changing. Even during the recent elections, these organisations issued covert appeals to the community, asking them to keep in mind these caste consultations while voting. Wilson said that many areas also saw these groups issuing ultimatums to candidates, asking them to vouch for their opposition to the caste legislation in lieu of support from the Indian community.

In its appeal to the British Hindu community, the National Council of Hindu Temples stopped short of openly backing May but asked the community to decide between May, “who performed Abhishek with Britain’s Hindus” or Corbyn, who “snubbed Modiji’s parliamentary address and is determined to foist caste labels upon British Hindus.” The message was clear.

In addition, many believe that in a Brexit-scarred Britain, it has become critical that the UK government keep the community, with its entrepreneurial spirit and its influence with the Narendra Modi regime, in good spirits. “The rise of the Hindu Right is being entertained by this government, especially because of where this country finds itself – entering into an uncertain phase due to the impact that Brexit is likely to have,” said a rights campaigner who tracks government policymaking closely.

A cocktail of such acerbic criticism of the legislation, its proximity to the Indian government and its invoking of India’s self-respect and pride is making the May government dither on its own commitment to ban caste-based discrimination. In its consultation paper, the May government has asked whether such a law is even required to begin with. The paper asks, if, instead of creating a new legislation on caste, it should just leave to the courts to develop laws, as and when instances of caste-based discrimination reach the courts.

Such ambivalence and a refusal to bell the cat that caste discrimination in the UK has come to be has earned the May government severe flak from various quarters, including British politicians.

Graham Allen, former member of parliament, who stepped down after a 30-year-long run as an MP with the Labour Pparty, recently wrote an open letter to the equalities minister, calling the consultation the ‘most misleading and biased’ consultation he had seen in his career, saying that there was a clear intention to delay the legislation, “probably forever.”

Varma, from the Dalit Solidarity Network, agrees. “Almost everyone I have spoken to has found the nature and terminology of the consultation quite shocking with a clear bias to developing case law.”

According to Keith Porteous Wood, the executive director of the National Secular Society, the government’s reluctance is abundantly clear. “The government have never sought to meet victims of caste discrimination. They seem more intent on listening to and giving weight to those opposed to the legislation, which in some cases could be perilously similar to giving weight to the views of misogynists opposing sex equality discrimination.”

Little wonder then that rights activists are getting increasingly nervous about their hopes to get a law to tackle the menace of caste discrimination.

For now, the UK government has extended the deadline for these consultations to end from July 18 to September 18. However, with both camps vociferous about its stance on the issue, the fault lines in the Indian diaspora are only going to grow deeper.

Kunal Purohit is a freelance journalist based in London.

  • Anjan Basu

    This is realpolitik at its best ( or worst, depending on how you look at it). Theresa May in a flowing silk saree, flanked by two appropriately goodly-of-girth Hindu priests, provides eloquent commentary on the state of conservative politics in the UK today. Patriotic ( read ‘hyper-nationalist’) Indians can derive great satisfaction from the spectacle of the once- mighty ‘Great’ Britain now prostrating herself at the feet of her erstwhile colony.

  • alok asthana

    Caste – the biggest evil and shame of hinduism. Just see the body of that priest in the photo – full of laddoos obtained free of cost – and shamelessness on his face. Parasites.

    • VIVEK

      How ignorant ?

      • alok asthana

        Would you like to explain?

  • Anjan Basu

    You mean, the British government ‘should go ahead and arrest people who encourage/practise discrimination’, don’t you? It seems that existing UK laws do not provide for any meaningful curbs on such discriminatory practices, and the whole idea was to bring in some legislation that will make such curbs possible. But political expediency appears to be the overriding consideration for May, who is deeply unpopular herself and is now clutching at every straw that she thinks could save her job. Hence the somewhat bizarre spectacle of the British PM, resplendent in her silk saree and Mangal sutra ( or whatever it is that she is wearing), proceeding to pay obeisance at some powerful deity’s sacred feet, presumably in London, of all places, so that ‘high-bred’ Hindu fanatics can help shore up her floundering premiership.

  • dsb_dsb

    How can you make the claim that Caste is related to religion & not other factors ?

    Secondly leave your prejudices at home i discuss & debate unlike net trolls so have a point with resources to back it up then post it here & discuss.

  • Anjan Basu

    Thank you for the information! I stand corrected. My point, however, remains: why do leaders of secular democracies ( a true democracy has necessarily to be secular) need to be seen to pander to religious sentiments of any kind, Hindu or Muslim or Christian or Sikh? Why do democracies increasingly revel in this ugly overlap of statecraft and religious practices? For Theresa May to perform Puja at a Hindu temple can only mean one thing: she needs the Hindu vote in the UK, and needs them desperately. It is a deeply hypocritical gesture, and deeply abhorrent to the secular sensibility.

    • VIVEK

      The good thing I like about democracy is that one has to take care of every group, one may like it or not. If a person takes care of many group, he gets a greater mandate. Is that wrong ?

      • Anjan Basu

        You raise a very important question, a question that indeed lies at the heart of democracy, a question that generations have wrestled with, each in its own way. How do you take care of everybody, of every citizen living in a democracy? The only unambiguous answer seems to be that the best that a functioning democracy can do is to try to achieve the greatest good for the largest number of its people. How do you do that? No cut-and-dried answer, but what is clear is that you need to enshrine principles of rationality, equity and fair play in all your institutions and social practices. A corollary to this is that you cannot pander to irrational, iniquitous or discriminatory sentiments anywhere. By dragging its feet on a common-sense legislation outlawing barbaric casteist practices, Theresa May’s government is seeking to subvert this basic tenet of a democracy.

      • maazkalim

        Or ‘she?’ 😉

  • VIVEK

    Both you and Rockstarrocks need deep study of Hindu religion before commenting about it. Half baked knowledge doesn’t help anyone.

  • The Wire

    We receive hundreds of comments every day and make it a point to check all of them. So please be patient. 🙂

  • The Wire

    We receive hundreds of comments every day and make it a point to check all of them. So please be patient. 🙂

  • alok asthana

    It is quite like a cigarette manufacturer making a charity towards reducing TB?
    And it is the people who make charities , not the fat pundits from their personal wealth. For centuries, they’ve held court over the powerless, with no accountability. The Ksatriya king did the same, but he at least had some accountability and responsibility.

    • si91

      What are you talking about? Most Brahmins who kept to their traditional priestly occupations were poor, and lived off of temple donations. Kshatriyas and Vaishyas were generally richer than Brahmins were.

      • alok asthana

        Are you trying to tell me that the brahmin community of India is restricted only to the 1-2 pujaris per temple, who live off the earnings of the temple? Do you really mean there are only that many brahmins in India?