Would Mexico be footing the bill or US consumers? What items would become more expensive? Is this even legal?
Washington: President Donald Trump is promising Mexico will pay for his massive border wall. On Thursday, his administration finally suggested how: a 20% tax on products imported from south of the border.
The new measure could be part of a comprehensive tax reform package that Trump and congress will work out, the White House said. But there was great ambiguity about the proposal. White House officials later clarified that the tax was one possible way Trump could finance the wall.
Much was left unanswered. Would Mexico be footing the bill or US consumers? What items would become more expensive? Is this even legal?
Some of the details Trump’s proposal still has to work out:
Is it a tax, a tariff or something else?
The White House said congress’ tax overhaul would place a 20% tax on imports from any country enjoying a trade surplus with the US. In other words, countries selling more goods and service to the US than buying from it. The idea is to rebalance the playing field for US companies by discouraging US citizens from importing.
The idea appears to overlap with a plan house Republicans are pushing called “border adjustment.” Under this plan, the US would refrain from taxing US companies’ exports but would tax imports.
The new revenues are projected to top $1 trillion over a decade. The money had been envisioned as an offset for lowering US corporate income tax rates, though house Republicans say it could also pay for a wall.
Trump, however, recently said he didn’t like the “border adjustment” idea.
What does this mean for US citizens?
Mexican products would become more expensive.
That means pricier tequila, but also things US citizens need: cars, eyeglasses and many basic groceries.
A Toyota Camry? About $1,000 more, according to Jim Lentz, CEO of Toyota North America, noting that a quarter of the car’s parts are imported.
US exporters are behind the house plan because it would reduce their taxes.
Here’s the flip side: importers, including big retailers and consumer electronics firms, say the higher prices for Mexican products could hurt sales. And that means US jobs.
Retailers such as Wal-Mart also could face higher tax burdens.
Would Mexico really be paying?
The US could recoup some of the wall’s costs by changing the tax and trade policies with Mexico. But the money wouldn’t necessarily be coming from Mexican taxpayers or the Mexican government.
While the tax would land first on companies exporting from Mexico, the costs would likely be passed on to consumers. That leaves US citizens footing much of the likely bill.
Trump has said he’s OK with being “reimbursed” at a later point because he is keen to start building the wall immediately.
Would it raise enough money to pay for the wall?
Various estimates put the wall’s cost at up to $15 billion.
House Republicans expect their plan to pull in much more than that in its first year. They say that could easily cover the costs of the wall.
Is it legal?
To be determined.
The US has a range of obligations under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and at the World Trade Organization (WTO). And Mexico is likely to challenge any new tax that penalises its economy.
Trump has said he plans to renegotiate NAFTA. Mexico, however, is under no obligation to soften the agreement for his sake.
Other countries may also object if their products and services are targeted.
Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, said the border adjustment is essentially a tariff that would be struck down by the WTO if it targets Mexico.
How would this affect the economy?
A topic of great dispute.
The White House said the plan would increase US wages, help US businesses and consumers, and deliver “huge economic benefits.” With so much of the plan ill-defined, it’s impossible to substantiate those claims.
Any turbulence in the US-Mexican trade relationship could have implications for the entire world.
Mexico is the second-largest exporter to the US, after China. The US imported roughly $271 billion of goods from Mexico during the first 11 months of 2016, according to the commerce department, and ran a trade deficit of almost $60 billion.
Do Republicans like Trump’s plan?
Not all of them.
Representative Justin Amash of Michigan said on Twitter it would be a “tax on Americans to pay for the wall.” Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said he was “mucho sad” and that “any policy proposal which drives up costs of Corona, tequila or margaritas is a big-time bad idea.”
Even Trump’s pick for commerce secretary, Wilbur Ross, dismissed the idea of using tariffs as a trade ploy.
Republicans have traditionally hailed themselves as the party of free trade.
What other ways could Trump get Mexico to pay?
During the campaign, Trump floated a number of possibilities without committing to any in particular.
He proposed changing a rule under the USA Patriot Act to block some of the roughly $25 billion in remittances that Mexicans living in the US send home each year. He said he would refuse to free up the money until Mexico agrees to pay the US between $5 billion and $10 billion.
Opponents of that plan say Mexicans in the US would likely find other ways to send money back. They could take cash with them when travelling, wire money to a non-Mexican bank or use off-the-books transfers that are difficult to police.
Trump also suggested increasing visa fees for Mexicans to raise money, or cancelling business and tourist visas issued to Mexicans until their country pays for the wall.